You Think Training Is Your Therapy? We Need to Explain Things to You a Little Bit Slower and With Simpler Words Than Usual
Mind9 min read

You Think Training Is Your Therapy? We Need to Explain Things to You a Little Bit Slower and With Simpler Words Than Usual.

Photo by Jordan Donaldson on Unsplash

Training can be the subject of therapy — that part you almost got right. But training alone, without an Other, is not therapy. It never was.

Share Article

Most people, athletes included, have no idea what therapy actually is. About 99% of them — whether they come from the gym, from the office, or from anywhere else — either don't understand it or don't want to understand it. Most therapists themselves don't understand it, despite spending at least five years in university to learn the trade.

It's not your fault. Well… anyway.

We are going to slow down and use simple words, and by the end of this article you will know more about therapy than the vast majority of therapists out there — even the ones with the diplomas. Isn't that amazing? Let's get going.

You Were Closer Than You Thought

You thought training was your therapy, and you were almost there. You were really close, actually.

Therapy can have your training as its subject. I have patients whose sessions are entirely about their athletic practice — programs, sets, competitions, deload weeks, the disappointment after a bad meet, the strange euphoria of a heavy single — and while we talk about that, they are doing the actual work of therapy, and making enormous progress in it.

"How is that possible? You're not making them talk about their childhood, their parents, their emotions? Therapy is supposed to be about that."

No. Therapy is talking about whatever you want, about whatever comes into your head. It is true that, in general, people are preoccupied with their childhood, their parents, their relationships and their emotional weather, and so in most therapies those things come up at some point. But that is a statistical fact about what tends to be on people's minds. It is not the definition of therapy, and it is not where the value lies.

The Whole Being Is in Every Fragment

Here is the part that even most therapists today fail to grasp: there can be more value, much more, in something that looks completely trivial — a training session you did yesterday, a reel you saw scroll past on Instagram — than in a long, well-rehearsed narrative about your childhood.

This is not a paradox. It is in fact one of the more interesting principles in existentialist thought: the whole of a being is present in each of its fragments. Sartre, in Existentialism is a Humanism, puts it bluntly: "the genius of Proust is the totality of the works of Proust; the genius of Racine is the series of his tragedies, outside of which there is nothing." He elaborates the same idea, more technically, in his Critique of Dialectical Reason under the name of totalisation — every part of a life is, structurally, a manifestation of the whole. There is no privileged material.

Freud already knew this, by the way. His Psychopathology of Everyday Life is an entire book devoted to the fact that the unconscious speaks through forgotten names, slips of the tongue, misread street signs — through exactly the kind of "trivial" stuff that the pop-cultural version of therapy dismisses.

The Pop-Culture Therapist, and a Test You Can Run

And while we are on the pop-cultural version: it isn't just the therapist nodding sagely while you recite the family history. It is the therapist who actively interrupts you to demand "yes, but now talk about your parents, talk about your childhood" — as if those topics were the job, as if they were impatient with you for daring to talk about anything else.

This is, by the way, a useful test you can run on any therapist. If they don't let you speak — or stay silent — freely, if they keep steering you back to the topics they have decided are the real subject, if they ask questions instead of listening, they don't know how to do their job. Walk out.

You are speaking, or not, and someone is listening for what you are not quite saying. The content is yours to choose. The work is elsewhere — and it has to be elsewhere, because the unconscious is not, as people imagine, "underneath." It is next to. It runs alongside what you are saying, not below it.

1:1 Supervision

A second pair of eyes. One that isn't yours.

A licensed psychologist who competes. Not to give you a program — to help you see what you cannot see from inside your own situation.

Apply for Supervision →

The Cheat Code That Doesn't Exist

Now to the core of the matter. If therapy can take training as its subject, then surely training — done alone, with enough attention, in the gym, with your own thoughts — is itself a kind of therapy?

This is, in fact, exactly what people who say "training is my therapy" really mean. The deep claim hidden inside that sentence is not about training at all. It is about the Other. They think they have life-hacked the system. They think they have found the cheat code that lets them do their therapy while bypassing the effort of there being someone else in the room.

They have not. The principle of therapy is always, structurally, the principle of supervision. Even when the material being supervised is your training, therapy itself is the act of interpreting what is happening in supervision, with an Other. The two terms are non-negotiable. There must be a supervisory position relative to the material, and there must be an Other.

The Therapist Is Not Above. The Therapist Is Next To.

A clarification, because the word "supervision" gets misread immediately and badly.

The therapist is not above. The therapist is not a teacher. The therapist is not the one who knows. The therapist is not there to explain to you what is going on, to put words on phenomena you supposedly can't articulate, to give you the framework. That fantasy of the therapist as the wise one with the master-key is exactly what most people imagine therapy is, and exactly what therapy is not.

The therapist's position is next to — not above. The same position, structurally, that the unconscious itself occupies relative to your conscious speech. The therapist works alongside you, with an ear trained for what you cannot quite hear.

Why an Other, and not yourself alone, after a heavy set, staring at the ceiling? Because the subject of therapy is the unconscious, and the principle of the unconscious is that it escapes us — or more accurately, that we arrange things, very actively, so that it escapes us. You are the one running the operation of hiding. You cannot be both the one who hides and the one who finds. Lacan made the point with brutal clarity: the unconscious is the discourse of the Other. There is no shortcut around that structure. No amount of solitary introspection in the rack will get you there, because solitary introspection is itself one of the techniques by which the operation of hiding is maintained.

Anything Rather Than the Void

What is therapy actually for, then? Two answers.

The first is small but real, and it matters. As a human being, you have things to say. You put words on things. You prefer anything to the void — and the word "anything" is meant literally.

This is what forms the great tragedies. People look at the wreckage of their own lives and say "but it can't be me who set this up — if I were the one doing this to myself I'd be a madman." No. You are not a madman. You are a human being, and a human being will choose anything — any story, any compromise, any self-sabotage, any catastrophe — over the void of having nothing at all to say.

The therapist is there, at minimum, to be the one who listens while another telling of the story becomes possible. That is not nothing. That is, in fact, considerable.

Desire Is Not Motivation

The second answer is desire. Therapy is the work on desire. The question therapy slowly, persistently, almost rudely poses is this: are you acting in coherence with your desire?

Desire, here, is not preference. Not what you would like. Not motivation.

Desire is your full potential. It is the miraculous version of you — the one capable of feats of strength that should not be possible. It is what makes you a human being and not something less than that. It is what moves mountains. It does not negotiate. It does not compromise. It is your vital force in its undiluted form. It is your destiny brought to completion. It is what you are.

Hysterical Strength

You already know this is real. If you train, you know it intuitively. You know that on certain days you lift something you had no business lifting, and that on other days, with everything dialled in, nothing moves.

The cleanest demonstration in nature is what physiologists call hysterical strength — and the name itself, for those familiar with the analytic literature on hysteria, is not coincidental.

The textbook case: a woman who has never trained a day in her life lifts a 400-kilo car off the ground because her children are pinned under it. The musculature did not change between yesterday and that moment. What changed is that, for the duration of that act, the entire economy of compromise and inhibition that normally governs the body collapsed, and desire — desire to save the children, in a register that has nothing to do with conscious choice — passed through directly.

Most of your training life is conducted under that economy of compromise. So is most of your life, period. You operate at a fraction of what is available to you, because the full version is being held back by something. By many things.

If you are interested in your own full potential — the miraculous version, the one that is in fact available to you — you should know that it can be accessed. This is what is worked on in therapy. Not "managed," not "coped with," not "regulated." Worked on, directly.

What holds you back are the paradoxes of your own existence, the compromises you have made and keep remaking because of your fantasies. Lacanian psychoanalysis has spent decades elaborating the technical structure of the fantasy and how it functions as a brake on desire; this is not the article in which we will get into that. For now: the fantasy holds you in place, and therapy is the work of meeting it, recognizing it, and freeing the desire it has been keeping captive.

The Little Voice You Already Hear

You know all of this already, on some level. You have felt it.

You have had sessions where your heart was not really there, and you knew it. You have had whole stretches of training, whole phases of your life, where you suspected you were sabotaging yourself, and you brushed it off. You normalized. You listened to the coaching podcasts that told you not every session is supposed to be miraculous, that consistency beats intensity, that 80% effort over time wins.

All of that is true, technically. And all of it is also, sometimes, a way of not hearing the little voice that wanted to say something else. The voice that suspects there is more going on. That something is being arranged, that you are part of the arrangement, that the gap between what you do and what you could do is not random.

Elite Protocol

One engine. 66 pages.

Programming, periodization, nutrition, and the psychological architecture that holds it together. Written by a licensed psychologist who trains. No AI. No templates.

Acquire Elite →

The One Condition That Cannot Be Hacked

Training is not your therapy. You already suspected it, which is why you read this far.

But therapy can be entirely about your training, if that is what you bring to it. The condition is the one condition that cannot be hacked: that there be someone else in the room, listening, next to you, for what you have not yet been able to hear.

Stop being interested in why you don't need it. Start being interested in what you have not yet said. The desire will follow.

Q&A

Common Questions.

Can talking about my training in therapy actually be useful?
Yes. Entire stretches of a serious therapy can have nothing as their explicit subject but the gym — programs, sets, competitions, deload weeks, the disappointment after a bad meet. The unconscious speaks through whatever you bring to the session. A back-off set tells your story as completely as a childhood memory does, if someone is listening properly. The content is yours to choose. The work is elsewhere.
So if training can be the subject of therapy, why isn't training itself therapy?
Because therapy is structurally a supervision, and a supervision requires an Other. The principle of the unconscious is that it escapes you — you are the one actively arranging things so that it escapes you. You cannot be both the one who hides and the one who finds. People who say 'training is my therapy' have, almost always, found a way to convince themselves they can skip the Other. They cannot.
Doesn't a therapist need to be the one who knows, who explains things?
No. The therapist is not above. Not a teacher, not the one with the master-key, not the one who puts words on phenomena you supposedly can't articulate. The therapist's position is next to — the same position the unconscious itself occupies relative to your conscious speech. Any therapist who interrupts you to demand you talk about your parents or your childhood, who steers you back to topics they have decided are the real subject, doesn't know how to do the job.
Is desire the same thing as motivation?
No. Motivation is a mood — it comes and goes, depends on sleep, weather, caffeine, narrative. Desire is your full potential in its undiluted form. It is what makes feats of hysterical strength possible. It does not negotiate, does not compromise, does not depend on whether you feel like it. It is what you are when nothing is holding you back. Therapy works on desire. Coaching can work on motivation. The two are not the same operation.
How do I know if I need supervision and not just better programming?
If you keep arriving at the same wall under different framings — every new program fades within weeks, every approach becomes the justification for the last one not having worked, the gap between what you do and what you could do feels suspiciously stable — then the problem is no longer purely a training problem. It has become a question of the relationship between you and your own desire. That is what supervision exists for.

References

  1. [1]Sartre, J-P. Existentialism is a Humanism (1946).
  2. [2]Sartre, J-P. Critique of Dialectical Reason (1960).
  3. [3]Freud, S. The Psychopathology of Everyday Life (1901).
  4. [4]Lacan, J. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis — Seminar XI (1964).
Share Article

Keep Reading

More Articles.

If this resonated, the rest of the work is here.

Newsletter

Stay in the loop.

New articles, new store drops — be the first to know.

Why Training Is Not Your Therapy | Parla Force | Par la force